The Mirror Has Dog Faces

Vanity Fair published an interesting piece about America’s Sweetheart Chelsea Clinton. What makes the article interesting is its lack of puffiness; the author is not impressed with the new, outspoken Chelsea Clinton. Nor am I.

Amid investigations into Russian election interference, perhaps we ought to consider whether the Kremlin, to hurt Democrats, helped put Chelsea Clinton on the cover of Variety. Or maybe superstition explains it. Like tribesmen laying out a sacrifice to placate King Kong, news outlets continue to make offerings to the Clinton gods. In The New York Times alone, Chelsea has starred in multiple features over the past few months: for her tweeting (it’s become “feisty”), for her upcoming book (to be titled She Persisted), and her reading habits. The puff pieces in other outlets—Elle, People, etc.—are too numerous to count.

Every liberal media outlet in the nation is trying to make Chelsea “a thing” now, and I am absolutely perplexed as to why. Chelsea has less charisma than her mother, but a much larger entitlement attitude.

Chelsea, people were quietly starting to observe, had a tendency to talk a lot, and at length, not least about Chelsea. But you couldn’t interrupt, not even if you’re on TV at NBC, where she was earning $600,000 a year at the time. “When you are with Chelsea, you really need to allow her to finish,” one of Clinton’s segment producers at NBC, told Vogue. “She’s not used to being interrupted that way.”

Sounds perfect for a dating profile: I speak at length, and you really need to let me finish. I’m not used to interruptions.

In short, she is the (literal) spitting image of her mother; which is exactly what America needs at its helm right now, amirite?

You can read the complete article at the link. I’d recommend it, if only because T.A. Frank was most likely fired, drawn, and quartered moments after filing the article.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “The Mirror Has Dog Faces

  1. To me this statement tells me all I need to know about this dimwit and her self-absorption. On her time in the “fiercely meritocratic” workplace of Wall Street: “I was curious if I could care about [money] on some fundamental level, and I couldn’t.” What an entitled little witch!

    Like

  2. Keep making that ugly face and some day you to can look just like Hillbag. When does she start wearing the god-awful pant suits?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s